Banking-as-a-Service: Navigating the Upheaval

The Banking-as-a-Service (BaaS) model is currently experiencing significant challenges, as highlighted in PYMNTS’ monthly “What’s Next in Payments” series. Synapse has declared bankruptcy, and Evolve Bank and Trust has been issued a cease-and-desist order, requiring Federal Reserve approval for any new FinTech partnerships.

Despite these setbacks, Lydia Inboden, Chief Revenue Officer of Ingo Payments, remains optimistic about the longevity of the BaaS industry. Inboden noted that the current turmoil does not signify a systemic collapse but rather a combination of factors shedding light on vulnerabilities within different business models. «These incidents highlight the vulnerabilities in different business models,» Inboden commented during the interview for the series.

Regulatory bodies are now developing additional frameworks to better govern FinTechs and their partnerships with financial institutions. Inboden predicts a shakeout among some players in the industry, particularly those that have commoditized bank charters and disintermediated banks from FinTech programs. «That’s where we’re starting to see things break down,» she observed.

In the early days of BaaS, there were only a handful of sponsor banks focused on money movement and card issuance. Today, there are over 30 sponsor banks, and 76% of banks view FinTech partnerships as a future growth area. This trend suggests a shift towards a direct business model, where FinTechs maintain direct relationships with financial institutions holding consumer funds.

Direct relationships offer several advantages, including enhanced vetting of FinTechs through anti-money laundering and compliance programs. «The financial institution needs to be able to show proper oversight into all those downstream partners,» Inboden explained. These relationships also help ensure FinTechs have the capacity to manage fraud and marketing activities, and assess whether their bank partners have adequate liquidity and capital.

The current climate may also impact open banking. Larger financial institutions might become hesitant to share data with riskier downstream FinTech partners. Early Warning, for example, does not allow FinTechs or neobanks to access their banking data through APIs. This could hinder money mobility, necessitating clearer and more transparent communication from digital-first brands.

«As the tea leaves ‘fall,’ I think we’re going to have a better framework for operating [these partnerships] … The banks need a playbook,» Inboden concluded.

Other articles
This Week in AI: Security Flaws, Advanced Robots, and New Regulations
Leveraging AI to Enhance Model Risk Management in FinTech
Porsche Auto Insurance Introduces Unlimited Policy for High-Mileage Drivers
Visa Direct to Deliver Faster Bank Transfers in Under a Minute
The Evolution of Pay by Bank: A New Era in Payment Solutions
How Open Banking is Transforming WealthTech: Insights, Challenges, and Future Directions
FlexPoint Revolutionizes ACH Payments with AI-Driven System
The Transformative Role of AI in Financial Services: Insights from Mastercard
Roadzen Partners with Motive to Offer Roadside Assistance to Over a Million Vehicles
Škoda and Parkopedia Enhance In-Car Payment Services with New Notification Features
AI, Automation, and Open Banking Drive Growth in Fintech-as-a-Service
Fintech for Good: Dock and Parabank Join Forces to Champion Disability Inclusion in Financial Services
How AI Revolutionizes the Fight Against Economic Crime
Fintech 2024 in Review: Key Takeaways and Predictions for 2025
Utilizing Artificial Intelligence Technology to Explore New Frontiers in Tax Compliance