Signals: Misreading the Regulatory Message in BaaS Partnerships

In the evolving landscape of Banking-as-a-Service (BaaS) partnerships, the terms «direct,» «indirect,» and even «truly direct» have sparked confusion and misinterpretation regarding regulatory expectations, according to This Week in Fintech.. These terms, while popular in industry discussions, fail to address the core concerns of bank examiners regarding the safety and soundness of BaaS partnerships.

Recent events have highlighted the regulatory scrutiny on bank-fintech relationships. Banks such as Blue Ridge Bank, Lineage Bank, and First Fed Bank have faced regulatory actions due to insufficient compliance and risk management practices related to their partner banking activities. In response, several banks and platforms, including Metropolitan Commercial Bank (MCB), Piermont Bank, and Treasury Prime, have either reevaluated their BaaS strategies or exited the space entirely.

Operational breakdowns in partnerships between Synapse and Evolve Bank & Trust, as well as Choice Financial Group’s consent order and the sale of CBW Bank, further underscore the importance of regulatory compliance in BaaS partnerships.

Despite these developments, a narrative has emerged suggesting that regulators are cracking down on «indirect» BaaS partnerships and advocating for «direct» relationships between banks and fintechs. This narrative, which implies that regulators may favor «truly direct» partnerships, misses the regulatory intent and could lead to misdirection in the market.

It is crucial for banks and fintech companies to understand that regulatory scrutiny focuses on ensuring that BaaS partnerships do not compromise risk management or compliance obligations. The distinction between «direct» and «indirect» partnerships, while relevant in certain contexts, should not be misinterpreted as a regulatory mandate.

The regulatory message for BaaS partnerships is clear: banks must prioritize risk management and compliance in all partnerships, regardless of the directness of the relationship. Failure to do so could result in regulatory action and reputational damage for all parties involved.

Other articles
The Evolution of Pay by Bank: A New Era in Payment Solutions
How Open Banking is Transforming WealthTech: Insights, Challenges, and Future Directions
FlexPoint Revolutionizes ACH Payments with AI-Driven System
The Transformative Role of AI in Financial Services: Insights from Mastercard
Roadzen Partners with Motive to Offer Roadside Assistance to Over a Million Vehicles
Škoda and Parkopedia Enhance In-Car Payment Services with New Notification Features
AI, Automation, and Open Banking Drive Growth in Fintech-as-a-Service
Fintech for Good: Dock and Parabank Join Forces to Champion Disability Inclusion in Financial Services
How AI Revolutionizes the Fight Against Economic Crime
Fintech 2024 in Review: Key Takeaways and Predictions for 2025
Utilizing Artificial Intelligence Technology to Explore New Frontiers in Tax Compliance
Mastercard and Worldpay Introduce Virtual Cards for Travel Agents
Paying Made Easy: BMW Introduces In-Car Payment System
Digital Wallets: Revolutionizing Global Finance by 2025
How AI and Enhanced Financial Education Are Transforming Wealth Management